Stradbroke Island Management Organisation (SIMO) and other groups and residents are concerned that the aquifer on North Stradbroke Island (Minjerribah) does not have the capacity to keep supplying 60% of Redlands’ water needs without environmental harm to the Island.

Wetlands rely on water from the Minjerribah aquifer
Wetlands rely on water from the Minjerribah aquifer

Minjerribah aquifer level is falling

The Minjerribah aquifer relies solely on rainfall. For years, Minjerribah has not been receiving enough rain to replenish the aquifer so water levels are steadily declining.

Many Island wetlands, mangroves and koala habitats rely on water flows from the aquifer to survive. Drying swamps are prone to increased fire risk. Falling water levels in the aquifer can risk saltwater intrusion. The Island’s economy needs a healthy environment.

Water extraction/water mining from Minjerribah to the Redlands commenced in 1996. Since then, about 20 million litres (20 ML) a day (7.3 billion litres a year) have been pumped across the Bay – without a study ever being done to determine what are environmentally safe amounts to remove. 

During the millennium drought in 2007 – and following island protests – the first Minjerribah water study was begun.

But the subsequent government abandoned the study before critical triggers could be established to determine when the aquifer was reaching dangerously low levels, and before a management plan was completed. 

Now falling aquifer levels on Minjerribah are causing concern once again.

Since the last drought, the aquifer level in the vicinity of the extraction borefield hasn’t even recovered, let alone built up.

The aquifer could have been allowed to recover during the years of abundant rainfall across South-East Queensland. But that didn’t happen. 

Modelling of the Minjerribah aquifer delayed

Recently, authorities promised to release updated modelling of the aquifer which would indicate safe extraction limits. But this modelling is yet to appear. 

Modelling is only as good as the data fed in. SIMO has concern about both the data quality and built-in assumptions driving the model.  The yield from aquifers – how much can be safely extracted without environmental harm – is very difficult to determine, given the number of variables.

But if we don’t know:

  • what harm water extraction has already caused Minjerribah’s environment
  • the risk of current damage
  • the extent of damage in future, given the same draw-down of water

then extraction should be suspended until the science is in. This is the rational course of action to ensure the resilience of the Minjerribah aquifer. 

Redlands can take more water from the grid

The Government and Seqwater could take some pressure off the aquifer by supplying more water to Redlands from the grid via the Eastern Pipeline Interconnector (EPI), and also by placing Redlands on water restrictions. 

This would be wise. These measures would allow the aquifer to recover. Why hasn’t this happened? 

In September 2019, Redlands was receiving 10-15 ML/day from the EPI (yet it has the capacity to deliver 22 ML/day), plus 5 ML/day from Leslie Harrison Dam – and the bulk, 20-25 ML/day, from Minjerribah. 

Increasing the amount of water supplied by the EPI would help. But the EPI is not able to supply all Redlands’ water needs: 40 ML/day.

If for any reason water from Minjerribah is not available, how would Redlands’ current water needs be met – let alone with added water demands of proposed developments like Toondah?

Community action to save the Minjerribah aquifer

Redlanders should be asking now about their future water security. 

Meanwhile, residents in the Redlands can each play a part in conserving water, as they did in the previous drought. 

Also, if you are a resident concerned about future-proofing the city’s water supply, there are some actions you can take to help save Minjerribah’s aquifer:

Send an email to the three authorities and ask: 

  • Why isn’t more water being brought into Redlands from the grid, to take pressure off Minjerribah’s aquifer?
  • What is an environmentally safe amount of water to export from Minjerribah, and what is the science to support it?
  • What is the trigger level for Minjerribah’s aquifer, below which extraction should cease because it will cause environmental harm? What is the science to support it?
  • Given the EPI only has a capacity of 22 ML/day – and Redlands needs 40 ML/day – where and how will Redlands (Including Southern Bay Islands) source water, without the supply from Minjerribah?

Also ask the authorities to:

  • Consider reducing/suspending water extraction from Minjerribah until science can show what is an environmentally safe amount to extract, if any.
  • Future-proof Redlands’ water supply so it is not reliant on the Minjerribah aquifer.
  • Introduce water restrictions now for the Redlands.

Contact:

Ask all mayoral candidates and division councillor candidates for the elections on 28 March what their position is regarding these questions and requests.

 Authorised by the SIMO Committee

Here is a link to the SIMO Facebook page

Redlands2030 – 8 February 2020

UPDATE 12 March 2020 – After the rain

It has rained recently. That’s really good news, especially on Minjerribah/North Stradbroke Island. But many will be surprised to know that much, much, much more rain is necessary to begin to replenish the island’s depleted aquifer – which supplies 60 per cent of the water consumed in the Redlands.

Meanwhile, we can rejoice that Leslie Harrison Dam (LHD) is now full. The combined capacity of the SEQ Water Grid has risen to 67.5 per cent. https://www.seqwater.com.au/dam-levels

With this very welcome reprieve in the drought, a window of opportunity now opens to allow Minjerribah’s aquifer and essential dependent ecosystems to begin to recover. 

The aquifer is at historic lows. It was not allowed to recover following the millennial drought of the early 2000s. Since then, the aquifer has only been further depleted by continuous pumping. The prudent course of action this time – if we are to ensure the future resilience of Redlands’ water supply – is to allow the aquifer to replenish. 

Rather than export 60 per cent of Redlands’ water needs from Minjerribah, we need to reduce that amount considerably for the time being. The Eastern Pipeline Interconnector (EPI) can deliver more of the City’s water. Of the 40 ML/day that Redlands uses, the EPI can supply 22 ML/day. And the LHD can deliver another 20 ML/day (the approximate capacity of Capalabah Water Treatment Plant). 

The use of these alternative and available water supplies in the Redlands would reduce the amount exported from Minjerribah to just that needed for the Southern Bay Islands (which for infrastructure reasons seem to be locked into Minjerribah’s water).

The total capacity of LHD when full is 13,206 ML, theoretically about 22 months’ supply (at 20 ML/day). But in practice, 22 months’ supply is not realistic because of evaporation losses and the need to maintain a preferred dam level. Low levels risk problems of water quality, including algal blooms.

How long the EPI and LHD can continue to supply the Redlands without Minjerribah water will depend on whether the rains continue. But any reprieve in pumping will help the aquifer and the island’s environment to recover.

For far too long everyone has assumed that Minjerribah’s water will always be there for the taking. There has been inadequate forward planning to avoid draining the aquifer to dangerous levels. 

This careless attitude is a legacy of when water extraction from the island began. But this attitude must stop, because the aquifer is not unlimited, and for years it has not been allowed to recover. 

It’s essential we have a long-term strategy for Redlands’ water security needs that doesn’t rely so heavily on Minjerribah’s aquifer. What are the options for future-proofing Redlands’ water supply without draining the aquifer on Minjerribah? For one thing, it is possible to increase the capacity of the EPI, and perhaps also the capacity of LHD. The small capacity of the EPI is a major flaw in the SEQ Water Grid.

It’s the right time to ask the authorities and the Council election candidates for their commitments to building water security for the Redlands and reducing reliance on Minjerribah’s aquifer.

Anyone who loves Minjerribah can help protect its environmental values by calling for these actions.

SIMO Secretary

Stradbroke Island Management Organisation (SIMO) is a community-based organisation on Minjerribah championing environmental, social and educational causes since 1978.

5 Comments

Ted Fensom, Feb 11, 2020

The water model was being developed by DNRME. They had only sorted out 80% of the model. We never received the paperwork. We Shouldbe writing to DNRME as well as SEQ Water. We also need some report on Eighteen Mile Swamp and its health. How much is leaving via Russell Island Pipeline to the GRID/LCC or RCC?

Dr Dennis Tafe, Feb 09, 2020

As a senior marine biologist with a PhD conducted in Moreton Bay, I have to question the wisdom of taking so much water from Minjerribah when we can see the aquifer receding at a number of locations on the Island. It is not prudent to wait until the environment of Minjerribah is damaged and the fresh water supply is contaminated with salt water before we start to act. Approximately half of the rates charged by Redland City Council is for water so mistakes at this time will be very costly. Minjerribah has a healthy population of koalas and other wildlife, which rely on healthy trees for survival. These trees in turn rely on fresh water. Experience in other parts of Australia indicates that when fresh water is contaminated with salt water the trees simply die.

Hans lieberman, Feb 08, 2020

Why do the “landowners” allow water to be stolen from island , by council?? I have been questioning the damage to island from water grab for over 15 years!!!! No one cares!! Ask council what percentage of their annual profil comes from straddie water!!yes it is sold on to Gold Coast and island residents are forced to pay for their own water usage????
INSANITY!!!! Can any one out there help???? Stop raping island for profit!!! Greedy thoughtless council!!!!!

examinator, Feb 12, 2020

Hans,
I think you might benefit from reading the STATE laws on underground resources.
In a nut shell you the land owner doesn’t own what is under your land it remains a state property.
It’s intentions were to protect someone claiming ownership of water ETC. assets for themselves excluding all others. i.e. water wars.
The law is based on words/ terms ( precedents) and their meaning and can be used to change the interpreted intention of their original framing.
Sadly they were written at a time when we believed such sources were infinite and there was no need to consider the future.
Knowledge acquisition has increased exponentially, we now know the aquifer source is dependent and finite.
The reality is that the aquifer is pouring into the sea and would continue to do so regardless of usage.The real problem is more along the lines of it’s replenishment. That means in essence not enough water is going in ( see Anthropogenic Climate Change [AGW]. Our Sshortermism/Denialism has exacerbated the issue.
Consider the man who jumped off the top of the Empire State Building (to prove that gravity didn’t have a down side) was heard saying as he passed the floors ” so far so good! Where’s the problem?”
In that analogy we are that individual and or federal/state/ council decision makers/ making we are now approaching free fall ( terminal velocity). It’s not the falling per se but the terminal velocity and the sudden stop that’s the killer.

examinator, Feb 08, 2020

YEP Shortermism of the council (ors) and development happy Mayors and business greed strikes again…..and again …ad nauseum.
I think it would be instructive to look back at old reports on the aquifer on its flow rates and supply capacity.
If my recollection is correct it was predicated on it being full and NO allowance was considered potential limitations to its replenishment due to Droughts etc.
A sad function of Shortemism is it assumed the impossible ( that what is today will continue in perpetuity). The laws of Physics ( which were known back in our grandparents age) dictate that the only constant is CHANGE.
As a matter of fact I submitted a objection to a large development over 20 years ago and one of my points was the finite nature of the available (dinosaur ) water. Granted I didn’t have specific measurements and there was no law that was being broken.
The response I got was in answer to an other question I didn’t cite.
* Therein lies the problem the council officers can only comment in terms of the letter of the law (accepted interpretation). Keep in mind the council officers who put these reports together aren’t lawyers ( nor are they Very experience, expensive ones either). This allows as previous mayors have done , sent the report back several times untill the revised report meets with their approval.
One can wonder then on what legal basis this acceptability is made ? Being the cynical, suspicious battle weary war horse that I am. I would offer conjecture that it would have at least been influenced by the developer ( possibly with the help of their lawyer). Big business has only one focus that of their own interests and to that end they will ignore potential future consequences for the clients. Company law and the Pty Ltd was invented to protect them from those possible consequences.

Please note: Offensive or off-topic comments will be deleted. If offended by any published comment please email thereporter@redlands2030.net

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.