Message to the State Government about Toondah …it is time to deliver

When the Member for Cleveland, Mark Robinson proclaimed the success of his Eastern Busway parliamentary petition as “an overwhelming success with the community making its voice heard loud and clear”.  He was touting that “over 1200 signatures” was “clear message to the State Government that it is time to deliver“.

Organisers of the recent parliamentary petition, aimed at stopping the mega-Toondah Harbour PDA development in Moreton Bay gathered 2300 signatures!

This was achieved without the profile or organisational capacity of local member of Parliament.  Petition organisers can but join Mr Robinson in saying that their 2 330 signatures was an even clearer message “to the State Government that it is time to deliver“.

What is a parliamentary petition?

Parliamentary petitions are one of the oldest mechanisms by which citizens can make requests direct to their representatives, through the parliament. A petition is a formal request placed before the Parliament with the intention of persuading the government to take a particular action. For example, a petition may request the alteration of the general law or the re-consideration of some administrative decision.  It is one means for people of conviction to speak directly to the members of Parliament. Last year it there were 176 e-petitions tabled in Queensland.

Parliamentary standing orders require the Clerk of the Parliament to refer the material parts of every petition presented to the Parliament to the responsible Minister who is required to forward a response to a petition to the Clerk within 30 days. The Clerk of the Parliament then (a) tables the response, (b) forwards a copy of the response to the Member of Parliament who presented the petition, (c) forwards a copy of the response to the principal petitioner and (d) ensures the response is published on the Parliament’s Internet website.

Petition 2537-15: Reasoned, reasonable & smart

The recent history of the push to the massive Toondah development has been widely canvassed in mainstream and social media. That the citizens of

The Toondah development footprint

The Toondah development footprint…it is all in the Bay

Queensland need to petition Parliament seeking its intervention speaks volumes for failed processes to date.  The Toondah petition (which for technical reasons of the parliament became three petitions (2537-16, 2562 -16 and 2537-16)) was compiled using both on-line and hard copy versions.

The petition reads:

Queensland residents draw to the attention of the House that they are averse to plans for massive residential development at Cleveland using large areas of the public estate including parkland and waters of Moreton Bay. This is the Toondah Harbour Priority Development Area (THPDA), the gateway to North Stradbroke Island. Most residents agree Toondah Harbour ferry facilities need to be renovated.

2014 plans included 800 apartments. The current proposal covers two and a half times more area, costing $1.4 billion with:
• 3,600 apartments, most on reclaimed land;
• 10,000 more people with probably 7,000 cars;
• A new suburb in Moreton Bay.

The THPDA is predicated on decisions of Government including:
• Approval of dredging to remove 70% more marine material than at Abbotts Point on the Great Barrier Reef;
• Revocation of part of Moreton Bay Marine Park;
• Amendment to the international RAMSAR agreement;
• Revocation of part of the publicly owned GJ Walter Park;
• Extension of the Urban Footprint of the SEQ Regional Plan into the sea.

The gift of public land to incentivise the project is another way to sell public assets without normal public scrutiny.

Your petitioners, therefore, request the House to call on the State Government to withdraw the THPDA and “start again” through a full and proper community consultation process which is:
• based on community vision and values;
• focussed on upgrading the ferry terminal facilities.

Is it “game over!”

Principal petitioners Brian and Jeanette Douglas of Cleveland were buoyed by the response to their call for people to sign.  One of the most telling statistics is that only 1.5% of people approached to sign the petition ….refused Easter Busway Pollto sign.

When the petition closed there were 946 signatures.  In this day and age many people (174) gave only their email addresses and so these people were discounted from the official tally which left 772 petitioners who gave the required home addresses.  Eleven (11) petitioners had responded on a non standard form which meant these views were recorded as a separate and different petition (and so a different numbered petition).

This number was swelled by the 1 373 e-petitioners who signed the on-line version of the petition.

The result?  The total number of signatories was 2 330 people.  Paraphrasing Mr Robinson MP and on the basis of the fewer signatures he garnered for the Eastern Busway  in respect of Toondah the petition was “an overwhelming success with the community making its voice heard loud and clear” and it was a “clear message to the State Government that it is time to deliver”.  People want the Government to “stop the rort: just fix the port”.

The Ministers response!

On the 18 April 2016, Minister Jackie Trad sent her response to the petition to Mr Neil Laurie, The Clerk of the Parliament.  Dozens of community

One "plain English" response to Minister Trads letter to the Parliament

One “plain English” response to Minister Trads letter to the Parliament (Curtesy P. Crane)

members have already inundated Redlands2030 web site with their views of the Ministers response and the open letter to the Minister, which can be found at Community will not tolerate Toondah deal – open letter to Deputy Premier Jackie Trad   in addition there has been a flurry of on-line comments.

It is less than favourable commentary on the content and adequacy of the letter as a response to the Clerk of the Parliament.  The letter parroted

previously used explanations of Minister Trads predecessor …the LNP’s Geoff Seeney.  Some people are wondering if the community would not have been better served by the 800 unit development encompassed in Minister Seeney’s PDA plan as opposed to the steroidal 3 600 apartments envisaged in Minister Trad’s nightmare propasal.

Is it more of the same?

The views of the community about Toondah Harbour development plans have driven parliamentary petitions for almost 30 years.  In the days before e-petitions (and email) an impressive hard copy petition was collated ….. that was in the days of name by name, person by person petitions.  The organisers collected the signatures of almost 12 000 people in 1988 under the direction of the Save Toondah’s Invaluable Resources (STIR) committee. That petition called for the Government of the day to stop the planned “development assault” on Toondah in a not dissimilar way to the outrage now being expressed. Many of the STIR committee members are still active in the community and are dismayed that promises by the government of the day to ” never do Toondah”  have been disregarded.

In February 2014 in the face of the diabolical community consultation on the Toondah Harbour Priority Development Area another Parliamentary petition of 1 211 signatories was rapidly gathered.  This petition was garnered in parallel  to the community consultation process, which Redland City Council itself sought to extend by a month.  The Councils resolution (carried 11-0) was rejected by the then Minister and advice given t the community after the nominal period had closed!  So the parliamentary petition of 2014 was open only a few weeks.

What is the score now?

So all up more than 16 500 people over there decades have taken the time to express their views on the residential development proposals near Toondah Harbour.  Clearly community views are at odds with the Government.  Government’s should be about protecting the livability and lifestyle of existing communities and Redlanders and Queenslanders are tired of having to this job for Governments.

Mrs Douglas said was grateful for the support she and her husband received from the thousands of people in all walks of life.  But she wonders “surely we do not have to door knock every house in Queensland to emphasise to the Parliament how important Moreton Bay is to Australia and the world”. 

Redlands2030 can predict the response by social media trolls making claims like “only 2 3o0” petitioners in a population of 150 000.  Perhaps those commenting in this might reflect on how by the same logic about the so called “will” of silent majority in respect of the extension of the Eastern Busway!  They might also reflect on how the number signatories came about … being the efforts of two people both volunteers.

Critics might also contemplate the measured objections now total 16 500 and that only a 1.5% of people approached refused to sign the petition.

Another online petition is open to people (including those resident outside of Queensland) because Moreton Bay belongs to everyone …not just those living in Queensland now.  People concerned about the Toondah abuse can still sign the petition Stop the rort: just fix the port.

Published by Redlands2030 – 25 April 2016

Please note: Offensive or off-topic comments will be deleted. If offended by any published comment please email

2 thoughts on “Message to the State Government about Toondah …it is time to deliver

  1. Mr Robinson’s claims about 1,200 petitioners is a precedent is worth heeding. If petitions are meaningless before the Parliament it neuters the voice of reasoned objectors and will leave the means of protest to more disruptive methods.. The numbers gathered by what seems was a few concerned citizen’s has demonstrably struck a cord with thousands of their fellow citizens. It should be ringing alarms bells in George street.

    The cloak of commercial in confidence gives the community no confidence in what looks and smells like a dud deal, and a dud development.

    But it is really sad to say, that this type of development in this day and age…could only happen in Queensland or in a third world country…and that hurts.

  2. It appears clear to me Dep Min Jackie Trad doesn’t have what it takes to do what’s right for the people of Redlands by ignoring thousands of signatures on petitions to call a halt to the obscene highly destructive coastal real estate development Redlands Mayor Karen Williams supports with no thought to the RAMSAR agreement to preserve habitat of shorebirds…some flying nonstop to Toondah Harbour from Russia…vital to their survival. Let’s face it…real estate developers don’t care about open space, parks (or why were 16 parks and reserves offered for sale?) As a retired pensioner in Capalaba, I was forced into, alone, with help from Redland Shire Council’s parks workers, to resurrect a local park a real estate developer cleared of trees/vegetation, help create a Reserve, plus a park by elderly and young families on Mt Cotton Rd Capalaba that Council under Don Seccombe’s regime, didn’t think they deserved to have.
    Deals done behind closed doors… where over past 4 years, five councillors were deprived of portfolios, kept in the dark with little or no chance of having what should have been round table robust discussions on how to proceed as a first step on the Toondah Harbour Project for benefit of the Redlands community as a whole….is a crime in my view.
    Instead, it seems, & I quote from Maria Whitey’s letter to 2030 Group in which she speaks of the Redlands Development Corporation’s influence in RCC. Who are the members? How much are they paid? Why do we need this group in RCC? Do other councils employ salaried real estate agents/developers guiding progress on major developments? If the reply is yes, then they should all be listed, along with Redland City Council, in Australia’s dodgiest councils.
    As a pensioner living by an increasingly heavily trafficked Finucane Rd Capalaba, we’ll be in permanent gridlock if we have 10,000 more residents as result of Toondah Harbour development, Shoreline, plus 10,000 in Thornlands. Jackie Trad needs to be nudged into taking action on our infrastructure needs now, not later. The ball is in her court.

Comments are closed.